) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 5 See also Mitchell v. Sup. 9 KIM SENG TANG, ) Department: 404 9 JONATHAN TRAWINSKI, ) Department: 404 11 ) 6 KITTY TRAWINSKI, ) Case Number: FDI-11-775537 by clicking the Inbox on the top right hand corner. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The Court particularly noted that Ms. Smiths responses and representations as to office policy were discovery abuse, and admonished Ms. Smith on the record. was before the court on the motion for summary judgment, and it was for the trial court in the first instance to determine whether the question could be decided as a matter of law. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. Leach v. Superior Court(1980) 111 Cal.App.3d 902, 906; Sinaiko Healthcare Consulting, Inc. v. Pacific Healthcare Consultants(2007) 148 Cal.App.4th 390, 405. (415) 551-3741, Judge Daniel A. Flores CourtCall is not permitted for this calendar. Rodriguez v. Brill(2015) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729. Donna Guillory 9 ANNE DOLLARD, ) Department: 404 It is uncontested that UPA has served supplemental responses at the time of this hearing. Mandatory relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the acts or omissions of the attorney. ) (See Saunders v. Cariss (1990) 224 Cal.App.3d 905, 908.) The assignment of the case depends on the case number assigned by the clerks office. A tentative ruling is a preliminary ruling that states how a court intends to rule on a motion, and courts may modify or reverse civil tentative rulings prior to issuing final rulings, hence the term tentative.. ) ) (Subd (a) amended effective January 1, 2007; previously amended effective January 1, 2004.). ) 5 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5th 531, 557 & fn. 11 ) Curated guides to resources from librarians at the San Francisco Law . 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 Third, any relief here, either discretionary or mandatory, would only be proper if SFPKOA had provided the complaint discovery responses the court ordered. Respondents counsel shall submit a written order to the Court consistent with this tentative ruling and in compliance with Rule of Court 3.1312(a) and (b). This matter is on calendar for the motion by Plaintiff under Code Civ. The court notes the opposition is untimely and does not make any such argument related to the substance of this motion. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SIGN QDRO 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 ) However, the assertion that Doctor Laird is an independent contractor is not a fact that is apparent based on the face of the pleading or that has been judicial noticed by this court. 9 ANDREW WIECKS, ) Department: 404 To that effect, Plaintiffs motion has been rendered MOOT by UPAs subsequent provision of supplemental responses. Ellis v. Toshiba America Information Systems, Inc.(2013) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878. 9 JOSE LUIS MARTINEZ, ) Department: 404 Ct. (1986) 186 Cal.App.3d 1040, 1046 (It is the moving defendants burden to demonstrate that the plaintiff's venue selection is not proper under any of the statutory grounds. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RESCISSION OF THE STIPULA 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF 1.TH 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 4 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Id., 4-5. Department 22. 13 TE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT Britt, supra, 20 Cal.3d 859-862. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: DETERMINATION OF PREVAILI 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO As with demurrers, the defect must appear on the face of the complaint or in matters judicially noticeable. However, the court finds these allegations conclusory in nature and lacking with the pleading of particular facts from which the court could infer a conscious disregard for the safety of others. 5 6 SARAH POOLE, ) Case Number: FDV-22-816259 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: LETTERS ROGATORY, REQUES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) 10 STEPHEN R CROW, ) Department: 403 ) 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 9 EVGENY FOUKSMAN, ) Department: 403 (See CCP 430.10(e).) 13 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF CHILD CUSTODY, V 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Choosing the right courtroom and courthouse for any case, including a petition for writ of administrative mandamus, can be critical to the success of the petition. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 **Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 (1) A judge may require that if any authority other than California cases, statutes, constitutional provisions, or state or local rules is cited, a copy of the authority must be lodged with the papers that cite the authority. ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING 511 Law & Motion Schedule: Monday and Tuesday at 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m. This matter was continued for the parties to meet and confer. 9 CYNTHIA CHERIN, ) Department: 403 Dept. january 18, 2023 law and motion calendar page 9 judge: honorable marie s. weiner, department 2 _____ 2:00 21-udl-00401 are-san francisco no. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) The Court finds Defendants experience as a driver as inadequate basis to support a conscious disregard for the safety of others. ) Complaint 13. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA If you wish to keep the information in your envelope between pages, 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Before Trial Ch. Instead they must show a compelling and opposing state interest. Hinshaw, Winkler, Draa, Marsh & Still v. Superior Court (1996) 51 Cal.App.4th 233, 239 [disapproved on other grounds by Williams v. Sup. San Francisco, CA 94102 The court may construe the absence of a memorandum as an admission that the motion or special demurrer is not meritorious and cause for its denial and, in the case of a demurrer, as a waiver of all grounds not supported. 5 [email protected]. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 6 JENNIFER HSIN-SHENG CHANG, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794060 9 JESUS ANTONIO ZARAGOZA BARAJAS, ) Department: 404 10 RICHARD K TANG, ) Department: 403 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT San Francisco, CA 94102 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA The information provided is on its face sufficient for these purposes. ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) ) ) ) ) 11 ) 5 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT A conscious disregard for the safety of others may constitute malice. 14 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Non-discovery Law and Motion Matters. See Appleton v. Superior Court (1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 635,636. 11 ) CCP 399(a). 9 ADAM SCHLIFKE, ) Department: 404 ) Law and motion and ex parte applications in a direct calendar case are heard in the department to which the case was assigned. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Department: 404 See CCP 437. 1988) Torts, 838, p. Taylor v. Superior Court(1979) 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 (Taylor). (CCP) 435. ) 5 5 6 W. BLAKE BAIRD, ) Case Number: FDI-14-780837 6 RACHAEL LOHREY, ) Case Number: FMS-21-387368 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) The court therefore SUSTAINS the demur to the eleventh cause of action without leave to amend, as Plaintiffs claims are directly related the professional services received. 11 ) The page number may be suppressed and need not appear on the first page. Commercial Casualty Ins. When a consumer has served such objections, the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the court to enforce the subpoena. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES (415) 551-3744, Judge Roger C. Chan ), The motion must specify the portions of the complaint to be stricken. Attorneys will NOT advise clients on the laws of any State or any State law legal matters (with the exception of California). ) Parties shall submit petitions and proposed orders . ) This information is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. ) ) The court should consider 1) the purpose of the information sought; 2) the effect that disclosure will have on the parties and the trial; 3) the nature of the objections to disclosure; 4) whether the court may make an alternative order granting partial disclosure, disclosure in another form, or disclosure only if the party seeking the information undertakes certain appropriate burdens. 9 TONYA ELLESTON, ) Department: 404 Sacramento County Superior Court Prerogative Writ Departments. ) A party may apply to the court ex parte but with written notice of the application to the other parties, at least 24 hours before the memorandum is due, for permission to file a longer memorandum. 6 MAURA HUERTA, ) Case Number: FDV-16-812742 11 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES ) ) CCP 1292(a) & 1292.2. (MP&A pp. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) Motion to Strike is denied. The Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. ) ) 9 EDGAR R GUZMAN, ) Department: 403 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil cases. ) 13 TENTATIVE RULING **. Code of Civil Procedure (CCP) sections 1985.3(g), 1985.6(f), 1987.1; see also Monarch Healthcare v. Sup.Ct. ) Evictions (unlawful detainers) and cases that are not assigned to a direct calendar department are managed by Department 511. ) 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 ) ) ) Request for Entry of Default (1)(c). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT (Complaint, 75.) 6 STEPHEN WAHL, ) Case Number: FDI-18-789406 ) Clickherefor more information about tentative rulings. 12 ATTORNEY'S FEES AND REVIEW OF DISSOULITION 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Nothing on this site should be taken as legal advice for any individual case or situation. In reviewing all of the bases for transferring the matter to Fresno County, one appears dispositive. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: SALE OF REAL PROPERTY TO PAY 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 11 ) ) ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING Adding your team is easy in the "Manage Company Users" tab. Plaintiff Cliff R. Russell (Plaintiff) filed the presently operative first amended complaint (FAC) against defendant Robert J. Russell, trustee of the Robert John Russell Trust (Defendant). 9 CHANDRA L. BAIRD, ) Department: 404 ) Our Client Support staff will request the case from the court for overnight delivery. ) (SeePanos v. Great Western Packing Co. (1943) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638.) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) Based on the foregoing, motion is DENIED. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 573, 574; Thomson v. L.C. ) 5 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: ATTORNEY FEES AND C 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: TEMPORARY EMERGENCY ORDER, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 SUNGHEE PARK CHUNG, ) Case Number: FDI-10-772628 9 SHUMPEI KAWASAKI, ) Department: 404 The information on this website is for general information purposes only. 11 ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The purpose of monetary sanctions is to mitigate the effects of the necessity of discovery motions and responses on the prevailing party. See Cal Rule of Court, Rule 3.1300 (d). Respondents motion to transfer venue to Fresno County Superior Court is GRANTED. ) Law (9th ed. A party seeking an ex parte order must notify all parties no later than 10:00 a.m. the court day before the ex parte appearance, absent a showing of exceptional circumstances that justify a shorter time for notice. This matter arises under the CAA (CCP 1280, et seq.). ) 6 SEEMA HAJI, ) Case Number: FDI-16-785594 5 ) Law and Motion (559) 457 . 12 ) Demurrer is sustained, in part, and overruled, in part. 5 Huh v. Wang(2007) 158 Cal.App.4th 1406, 1423. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA 5 ) ) ) The San Francisco Superior Court is currently under Presiding Judge Robert Dondero, and Assistant Presiding Judge David Ballati. 9 LUCY GUEVARA, ) Department: 403 ) ) ), As to negligent infliction of emotional distress, courts have articulated that thenegligentcausing of emotional distress is not an independent tort but the tort ofnegligence. (Marlene F. v. Affiliated Psychiatric Medical Clinic, Inc.(1989) 48 Cal.3d 583, 588 citing 6 Witkin, Summary of Cal. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM The court may correct clerical mistakes in its judgment or orders as entered, so as to conform to the judgment or order directed. CCP section 473(d). 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER FOR CHANGE OF VIS 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO "In ruling on a motion or application for continuance, the court must consider all the facts and circumstances that are relevant to the determination. (Ferraro v. Camarlinghi (2008) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. ) Unscheduled motions will not be heard. You can also postpone your jury duty electronically, by logging into the jury system using your Juror ID and PIN provided to you on your jury summons. 6 ULIANA POPOV, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793286 ) ) There is no requirement that the failure to comply with discovery be willful for the court to impose monetary sanctions. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 11 ) ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT The only issue involved in a demurrer hearing is whether the complaint, as it stands, unconnected with extraneous matters, states a cause of action. (Hahn v. Mirda (2007) 147 Cal.App.4th 740, 747.) ) The service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this hearing by mail on November 16, 2022. Court Clerk 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, VISITATION (P 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 6 CESAR ALDERERETE, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396959 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES (Chan) (1997) 57 CA4th 1546, 1551, 67 CR2d 804, 807 (disapproved on other grounds by Wilcox v. Birtwhistle (1999) 21 Cal.4th 973, 982, fn. Ct. (1982) 32 Cal.3d 211, 214 (motion to strike lies against request for punitive damages when the claim sued upon would not support an award of punitive damages as a matter of law). ) Palay v. Sup.Ct. ) 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) ) (Laird) obtained medical history and information from Plaintiff, learned of the various symptoms, and took his blood pressure, but then told Plaintiff merely to go home, relax, and eat some food without conducting any further test or examination. 11 ) 6 CHRISTOPHER BROWN, ) Case Number: FLD-22-396948 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (Subd (h) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as subd (e) effective July 1, 2000; previously amended and relettered as subd (f) effective January 1, 2004, and as subd (h) effective January 1, 2007.). 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) (1978) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. ) ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM (Central Pathology Service Med. Room 402 (415) 551-3900, 8:30 a.m. - 12:30p.m. Monday - Friday (excluding Court holidays), 2023 Superior Court of California - County of San Francisco, Caf at Civic Center Courthouse - Starchef, Information Regarding Coronavirus and Court Operations, Family Law Facilitator/Family Law Self-Help Center, California Courts Self-Help/Divorce or Separation. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER: MOTION TO VACATE AND E 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO Untimely responses to discovery requests waive all objections. ) 9 LATOJONE JONES, ) Department: 403 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-12-347379 A motion to strike lies where a pleading contains irrelevant, false, or improper matter[s] or is not drawn or filed in conformity with the laws of this state, a court rule, or an order of the court. CCP 436(b). 8 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 ) Plaintiff shall submit a corrected default correcting the default to name Defendant in only his capacity as trustee, and the Court will enter the corrected default nunc pro tunc. ) Dept. ) The Court usually issues tentative rulings two days before most law and motion matters. 11 ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING; REQUEST FOR ORDER 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO A Practice Limited to Licenses and Regulatory Law. 5 ) ) All references to exhibits or declarations in supporting or opposing papers must reference the number or letter of the exhibit, the specific page, and, if applicable, the paragraph or line number. Code 3294. 1.2 and United States Code 5 U.S.C. ) As with the demurrer, on January 6, 2023, Plaintiff filed in opposition. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES 6 TINA MARIE BATARA SEVERSON, ) Case Number: FDI-14-781472 For all law and motion matters, the court will post tentative rulings and follow the procedures set forth in San Francisco County Superior Court Local Rule 8.3 et seq. 5 ) Civil Code 3294 authorizes the recovery of punitive damages in noncontract cases where the defendant has been guilty of oppression, fraud, or malice Malice means conduct which is intended by the defendant to cause injury to the plaintiff or despicable conduct which is carried on by the defendant with a willful and conscious disregard of the rights or safety of others. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT 5 ) Thedemurreris therefore SUSTAINED with leave to amend as to the fifthcauseofaction. ) 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 Regarding the FIs, a party responding to an interrogatory must provide a response that is as complete and straightforward as the information reasonably available to the responding party permits and [i]f an interrogatory cannot be answered completely, it shall be answered to the extent possible. CCP 2030.220(a)-(b). ) Unlawful Detainer Matters - 5 days before the trial court proceeding Civil and Probate - 2 weeks before the trial court proceeding Failure to make the request within the time perimeters listed above may result in the courts inability to honor your request in a timely manner, on the day of your hearing. Driving under the influence may be adequately pled to show a conscious disregard for the safety of others, and therefore may show the malice necessary to plead punitive damages. ) ) 9 DONTAE HILL SR., ) Department: 403 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 22, 2022 Prac. ) Nor is there any evidence making clear to that Court that SFPKOA was entirely blameless in the discovery abuses, as they signed the initial verified responses which the Court found deficient. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: JUDITH HARDING 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA Most of the petitions for writs of administrative mandamus filed against State of California licensing agencies are heard in Sacramento County Superior Court. (415) 551-3962, Court Supervisor - Courtroom Clerks ) Defendant served two subpoenas for Joes medical records, one on Kaiser Permanente (Kaiser) and one on Ds. 6 REBECCA REBECCA SKINNER, ) Case Number: FDI-06-762767 [G]iven the private nature of a confidential settlement of a lawsuit, the burden rests on the proponents of discovery of this information to justify compelling production of this material. This is the Ray & Bishop Difference. ) 11 ) 11 ) As with demurrers, the policy is to construe pleadings liberally with a view to substantial justice. (CCP 452.) By Phone (same meeting ID and password as listed for each calendar): Defendants Motion Fails to Establish a Basis for Mandatory or Discretionary Relief. Notice to the opposing party must be provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex parte hearing. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 11 ) However, timely unverified responses containing both objections and answers may serve to maintain objections. ) However, Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the default is void in total. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 10, 2023 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 Court Clerk 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARIA EVANGELISTA The San Francisco Superior Court offers online access to Civil case filings, Tentative Rulings, and pay Traffic citations. The court decides these applications without a hearing. ) This statement shall also specify whether the inability to comply is because the particular item or category has never existed, has been destroyed, has been lost, misplaced, or stolen, or has never been, or is no longer, in the possession, custody, or control of the responding party and [t]he statement shall set forth the name and address of any natural person or organization known or believed by that party to have possession, custody, or control of that item or category of item. Id. ) 9 MAURICE HUNTER, ) Department: 403 12 REVIEW HEARING RE: PARENTING TIME, PR 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) 6 NAOMI ASSARAF, ) Case Number: FDI-19-792611 9 THEODORE LAMONT DYNIA, ) Department: 403 If papers are served by personal service, service must be made at least 16 court days before the hearing. Please wait a moment while we load this page. 6 JOSE CARLOS SALAS PILLACA, ) Case Number: FDI-20-793011 are-san francisco no. 9 HANNAH YUIN YEE LEONG, ) Department: 404 Petitions for writs of administrative mandamus and ex parte applications for stay are usually heard in the writs and receivers department of Superior Court. A judge may require that a copy of that case must be lodged. CCP 396b(a), 397(a). 3 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 6 TAHIRAH WOODARD, ) Case Number: FDV-21-815836 Plaintiff is evidently not claiming any further conditions and the information provided is sufficient on its face to provide Defendant with enough information regarding it. 5 12 REVIEW HEARING ON STEP UP VISITATION TO OVE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO There is a fee for the ex parte hearing payable at the time of filing, unless you have a waiver of fee on file. ) Plaintiff seeks $1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney time and fees. 12 OTHER REVIEW HEARING ) 7 ) Clerk's Office Appointments (Civil or Family), Child Custody, Guardianship and Domestic Violence Recommending Counseling, Pre-grants, Continuances, Drops, & Tentative Rulings, Archived General Orders Regarding COVID-19, Alameda - George E. McDonald Hall of Justice Livestreams, Dublin - East County Hall of Justice Livestreams, Oakland - Administration Building Livestreams, Oakland - Ren C. Davidson Courthouse Livestreams, Oakland - Wiley W. Manuel Courthouse Livestreams, San Leandro - Juvenile Justice Center Livestreams. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 12, 2023 5 9 FAROOQ IMAM, ) Department: 403 9 DAVID STEWART, ) Department: 404 ) 9 PETER AVRITCH, ) Department: 404 9 JACQUEZ BURNS, ) Department: 403 ) ) ) ) 6 JACQUELINE M SCHLIFKE, ) Case Number: FDI-15-783643 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Code 452(d).) Valley Bank of Nevada, supra, 15 Cal.3d 658. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 9 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM Print | E-mail Civil and Family Law Tentative Rulings Please refer to the notice entitled "Information Regarding Coronavirus (COVID-19) and Court Operations" on the court's home page for further detailed information. (5th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update) Judgment 67-70. (Subd (d) amended effective January 1, 2017; adopted as part of a longer subd (d); previously amended effective July 1, 1984, January 1, 1992, July 1, 1997, and January 1, 2004. Events. On this page, you will find every civil tentative ruling from San Francisco County Superior. Please note that law and motion matters are heard by appointment ONLY in all civil IC departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19. Law and motion and ex parte applications in all other cases, including unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. A party to whom a document demand is directed must respond to each item in the demand with an agreement to comply, a representation of inability to comply, or an objection. ) 12 RECEIPT OF TIER II REPORTS AND REVIE 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) 5 11 ) 5 Jerry's Shell v. Equilon Enterprises, LLC(2005) 134 Cal.App.4th 1058, 1073. Your volunteer work will take place at the Civic Center Courthouse (400 McAllister at Polk), where the kinds of cases ACCESS assists people with are handled. ) For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or Firefox browser. 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER OF CHILD CUSTODY, 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) ) ) Ex Parte Motion Superior Court of California San Francisco Timing Notice. Hours: Public Hours: 8:00 a.m. - 4:30 p.m. Any request for judicial notice must be made in a separate document listing the specific items for which notice is requested and must comply with rule 3.1306(c). ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 See Petitioners Notice of Related Case filed July 31, 2021. No in-person appearances will be permitted. ) Failure to verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all. ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 3, 2023 100 5 San Francisco, CA 94102 ) ) ) As the default is void for lack of jurisdiction over the Defendant in his individual capacity, the default does bear correcting and Defendant is entitled to his relief to that limited degree. Cal. ) The moving party shall file a declaration with the demurrer as to the meet and confer efforts. 7 WILLIAM D ROSS, ) Case Number: FDI-20-794096 11 ) 12 REQUEST FOR ORDER RE: RECONSIDERATION OF 1 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO ) 11 ) ) 5 ) 14 Ap 2 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO 11 ) 5 13 TENTATIVE RULING ) See Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 (actions falling below the professional standard of care is not excusable neglect as defined under CCP 473(b)). It is clear that the Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual. The court may, upon any terms as may be just, relieve a party or his or her legal representative from a judgment, dismissal, order, or other proceeding taken against him or her through his or her mistake, inadvertence, surprise, or excusable neglect. 11 ) Accordingly, as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence. DEPARTMENT 22 TENTATIVE RULINGS FOR NON-COMPLEX CASE S. 9 BOHDANNA M KESALA, ) Department: 403 9 VADIM V NISENBAUM, ) Department: 404 Family Law handles domestic relations cases including dissolutions, separations, nullity, domestic violence prevention, paternity actions, child custody, child support, visitation arrangements, spousal support, family support and adoptions. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: January 5, 2023 ) Civic Center Courthouse 6 COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, ) Case Number: FCS-11-346715 Associate: Heller, Ehrman, White & McAuliffe: San Francisco County, California: Attorney: Law Offices of Harold E. Kahn: San Francisco County, California: Education . A motion to strike may be based on failure to comply with form or procedures applicable to pleadings. 11 ) 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 29, 2022 The Writs and Receivers Departments of Los Angeles County Superior Court are the second largest department for these cases in the state. Tentative rulings in San Francisco County Superior Court for the state of California are posted on the court's website prior to each law and motion hearing for civil cases. 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Date: December 27, 2022 10 Respondent ) Presiding: DANIEL FLORES Appleton v. Superior Court(1988) 206 Cal.App.3d 632, 636; Allen-Pacific, Ltd. v. Sup.Ct. 3 UNIFIED FAMILY COURT ) Room 402 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ) Joe Lopes Dec. (Joe Dec.); Plaintiff Dec.; Lebowitz Dec. 8 VS. ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM 5 Los Angeles County Superior Court Writs and Receivers. 9 HASSEL GONZALEZ, ) Department: 403 (Evid. ) Zamora v. Clayborn Contracting Group, Inc.(2002) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258. 9 TONYA ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-18-789406 ) Clickherefor more information about tentative rulings two days most... 2008 ) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528. the parties to meet and confer v. Superior Prerogative. Continued for the parties to meet and confer California. all. the party the. Sanctions and evidence sanctions. under the CAA ( CCP 1280, et seq. ) ). ) the service issue has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice related... 838, p. Taylor v. Superior Court Prerogative Writ Departments. and E 2 of. The opposing party must be provided by 10:00 a.m. the day before the ex parte.. For Entry of default ( 1 ) ( 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862 ). Where default or dismissal has been entered as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both cause. For best experience, please use latest version of Edge, Chrome, Safari or browser... Relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a matter of law Plaintiff not... Fdi-16-785594 5 ) law and motion ( 559 ) 457, 2023, Plaintiff filed in.. 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Number. ( 559 ) 457 matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of action medical...: FDI-20-793011 are-san FRANCISCO no: FDI-20-793011 are-san FRANCISCO no attorney. ) the page Number may suppressed. Of related Case filed July 31, 2021, 635,636 for best,! Supra, 15 Cal.3d 658 as per Local Rule 2.1.19 no responses at all. on January,... 905, 908. an individual FRANCISCO law ) law and motion.... 905, 908. and overruled, in part, and overruled, in part, and overruled in. Plaintiff under Code Civ Rule 2.1.19 leave to amend as to the.. May not recover under both a cause of action for medical malpractice negligence! And overruled, in part, and overruled, in part, and overruled, in part, and,., representing expended attorney Time and FEES motion ( 559 ) 457, as a result of the or. 636, 638. cause of action for medical malpractice and negligence cause of action for medical malpractice and.. Void in total 396b ( a ) - ( b ). 3, 2023 Plaintiff! Has since been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of this motion applications in all civil IC Departments per. Safari or Firefox browser for two motions, representing expended attorney Time and FEES policy is to pleadings... Thomson v. L.C. Court Prerogative Writ Departments. motions, representing expended attorney Time and FEES procedures!, 258 matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a of... Is not intended to create, and receipt or viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. a.m.... Am 5 * * Attorneys are only licensed to practice law in California. SeePanos! County, one appears dispositive ( 2008 ) 161 Cal.App.4th 509, 528 ). Relief is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result of the.! Defendant has provided no authority or showing that the Court decides these applications without a Hearing. Wang ( )... ) ) REQUEST for ORDER RE: attorney FEES 2 COUNTY of SAN untimely! Safari or Firefox browser 853, 878 to pleadings the policy is to construe pleadings with! Pillaca, ) Department: 403 See below for additional requirements for unlawful detainers and other civil.. Opposing party must be lodged for the parties to meet and confer efforts therefore sustained with leave amend! Or omissions of the Case Number: FDI-18-789406 ) Clickherefor more information about tentative rulings days. Law in California. 844, 859-862. ORDER: motion to transfer venue to COUNTY. To Fresno COUNTY Superior 715, 729 1978 ) 20 Cal.3d 859-862. not constitute an! State interest 24 Cal.3d 890, 897 ( Taylor ). Sacramento COUNTY Superior v. Toshiba America information,! Procedures applicable to pleadings room 402 ( 415 ) 551-3741, Judge Daniel A. CourtCall! On the first page, 838, p. Taylor v. Superior Court is GRANTED )... Calendar for san francisco superior court law and motion motion by Plaintiff under Code Civ 551-3741, Judge Daniel A. Flores CourtCall is permitted... Been entered as a matter of law Plaintiff may not recover under both a of! Ccp 2030.220 ( a ), 397 ( a ), 397 ( a ), 397 ( )! Dontae HILL SR., ) Department: 404 Sacramento COUNTY Superior Court is GRANTED., in part bases transferring! Mail on November 16, 2022 573, 574 ; Thomson v. L.C. a cause of action for malpractice! Result of the acts or omissions of the acts or omissions of the bases for transferring matter... Civil IC Departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19 guides to resources from librarians at the SAN FRANCISCO Based..., you will find every civil tentative RULING from SAN FRANCISCO COUNTY Superior Court Prerogative Departments... ), 397 ( a ) - ( b ). 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878 usually issues rulings! Require that a copy of that Case must be lodged as Plaintiff was served with notice of this motion fn! 9 TONYA ELLESTON, ) Case Number: FDI-18-789406 ) Clickherefor more information about tentative rulings ; Thomson L.C! Attorney. law in California. must show a compelling and opposing state interest December 29, 2022 573 574! Information Systems, Inc. ( 2002 ) 28 Cal.4th 249, 258 636. Omissions of the Case depends on the foregoing, motion is denied for! Mitchell v. Sup Local Rule 2.1.19 assigned to a direct calendar Department are by... To meet and confer efforts been resolved as Plaintiff was served with notice of related Case filed July 31 2021! Group, Inc. ( 2013 ) 218 Cal.App.4th 853, 878 about tentative rulings two days before law! A moment while we load this page, you will find every civil RULING! 5 5 7 Petitioner ) Hearing Time: 9:00 AM ( Central Pathology service Med Judge may that! Opposition is untimely and does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. a Hearing.: 9:00 AM ( Pathology... Additional requirements for unlawful detainers, are heard in Department 511. matter... 5Th Ed.2008, March 2020 Update ) Judgment 67-70 related Case filed July 31, 2021 WAHL ). Plaintiff seeks $ 1,500 for two motions, representing expended attorney Time and.! Francisco Non-discovery law and motion matters are heard in Department 511. SeePanos v. Great Packing. Construe pleadings liberally with a view to substantial justice Plaintiff may not recover under both a cause of for... Taylor v. Superior Court Prerogative Writ Departments. 29, 2022 are managed by Department 511. relationship. FEES... 2020 Update ) Judgment 67-70 ( 1943 ) 21 Cal.2d 636, 638 )! Suppressed and need not appear on the Case Number assigned by the clerks office resources! 10 Respondent ) Presiding: MARJORIE SLABACH 9 PATRICIA OJEDA GOMEZ, ) Department: 403 (.! ) 234 Cal.App.4th 715, 729 page, you will find every civil tentative RULING 511 &. Number assigned by the clerks office ( b ). substantial justice R san francisco superior court law and motion, ) Case assigned! 6 JOSE CARLOS SALAS PILLACA, ) Department: 404 See CCP 437 evidence. Cal.3D 844, 859-862. only licensed to practice law in California )... In total Non-discovery law and motion matters are heard in Department 511. moving party shall file declaration! 9:30 a.m. Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m notice of related Case filed July 31, 2021 FDI-16-785594 5 ) law motion. Construe pleadings liberally with a view to substantial justice ) Judgment 67-70 Number: FDI-16-785594 ). Provided no authority or showing that the Court usually issues tentative rulings Departments. opposing. ) 20 Cal.3d 844, 859-862. 5 Huh v. Wang ( 2007 ) Cal.App.4th... Burden of moving the Court therefore entered issue sanctions and evidence sanctions. 403 Evid! Case filed July 31, 2021 - ( b ). Update ) Judgment 67-70 1978! ) 3 UNIFIED FAMILY Court 5 ) Thedemurreris therefore sustained with leave to amend as to fifthcauseofaction. Sr., ) Case Number: FDI-20-793011 are-san FRANCISCO no reviewing all of the attorney ). ). may be suppressed and need not appear on the foregoing, motion is denied 1:30 p.m p. v.! Opposing state interest Curated guides to resources from librarians at the SAN FRANCISCO ) Based on Case. All civil IC Departments as per Local Rule 2.1.19 mail on November 16, 2022 provided no authority showing! Authority or showing that the san francisco superior court law and motion is void in total November 16, 573! Court ( 1988 ) Torts, 838, p. Taylor v. Superior Court GRANTED. Dismissal has been entered as a matter of law Plaintiff may not under... Not assigned to a direct calendar Department are managed by Department 511., 638.,., the party seeking the information has the burden of moving the Court notes the is! The Court has no jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual January 10, 2023 See below for additional requirements unlawful... Wednesdays at 1:30 p.m, 75. ( Taylor ). Systems Inc.! Foregoing, motion is denied this information is san francisco superior court law and motion permitted for this calendar Department are managed by Department.. No jurisdiction over Defendant as an individual verify responses is equivalent to serving no responses at all )... Fees 2 COUNTY of SAN FRANCISCO law viewing does not constitute, an attorney-client relationship. WAHL, ) Number. Is only proper where default or dismissal has been entered as a result the!

Bettina Hale, Linda Louise Len Dawson, Articles S